Federal drug laws create a labeling problem. When you hear the term "drug trafficker," you may think about Pablo Escobar or Walter White, but the truth is that under federal law, drug traffickers include individuals who buy pseudo-ephedrine for their methamphetamine dealer; function as middleman in a series of little transactions; or even get a suitcase for the incorrect good friend. Thanks to conspiracy laws, everyone on the totem pole can be based on the same severe compulsory minimum sentences.
To the men and ladies who prepared our federal drug laws in 1986, this may come as a surprise. According to Sen. Robert Byrd, cosponsor of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986, the reason to connect 5- and ten-year compulsory sentences to drug trafficking was to punish "the kingpins-- the masterminds who are actually running these operations", and the mid-level dealers.
Fast forward twenty-five years. Today, almost everyone convicted of a federal drug crime is convicted of "drug trafficking", which usually results in at least a five- or ten-year compulsory jail sentence. That's a great deal of time in federal prison for lots of people who are minor parts of drug trade, the large bulk of whom are males and females of color.
This is the system that federal district Judge Mark Bennett sees every day. Judge Bennett sits on the district court in northern Iowa, and he manages a lot of drug cases. "Never could I have actually pictured," he writes in a current piece in The Nation, "that ... after nineteen years [as a federal district court judge], I would have sent 1,092 of my fellow citizens to federal jail for mandatory minimum sentences varying from sixty months to life without the possibility of release. The majority of these ladies, males and young adults are nonviolent druggie." What about the kingpins? "I can count them on one hand," he says.
The numbers can't communicate the absurd disaster of all of it. This is how he describes a current drug trafficking case:
I recently sentenced a group of more than twenty offenders on meth trafficking conspiracy charges. Eighteen were 'pill smurfers,' as federal district attorneys put it, suggesting their function amounted to regularly buying and delivering cold medicine to meth cookers in exchange for really small, low-grade quantities to feed their extreme dependencies. All of them dealt with obligatory minimum sentences of sixty or 120 months.
They discovered that in 2005, the bulk of the lowest-level cocaine- and crack-trafficking offenders-- men and women described as "street-level dealerships", "couriers/mules", and "renter/loader/lookout/ enabler/users"-- got five- or ten-year necessary jail sentences. This is especially real for crack-cocaine accused, most of whom are black; regardless of the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010, offering a little quantity of fracture cocaine (28 grams) brings the very same mandatory minimum sentence-- five years-- as offering 500 grams of powder drug.
This is the truth for which proponents of serious federal drug laws need to account. We must admit that our sentencing of small players in the drug trade to prison terms suggested for the leaders of large drug organizations-- as a typical incident, not as an exception.
If lengthy obligatory minimum sentences for nonviolent drug addicts https://www.criminallawyerslasvegas.com/drug-conspiracy-defense-las-vegas/ actually worked, one might be able to rationalize them. I have actually seen how they leave hundreds of thousands of young kids parent less and thousands of aging, infirm and passing away parents childless.
Here, once again, we have evidence that Judge Bennett is right: long necessary sentences are unneeded for many drug transgressors. In 2002 and 2003, Michigan and New York rescinded obligatory sentences for drug transgressors and gave judges the power to impose shorter sentences, probation, or drug treatment.
He has seen mandatory laws written for the most serious, large-scale drug dealers used to the males and women on the least expensive rungs of the drug trade, and he has actually seen it happen a lot. We once imagined that severe obligatory sentences would be used to deal with the leaders of large drug operations.
If you have been charged with a drug related offense and need qualified representation, contact us to discuss your case.
Contact:
Mace Yampolsky & Associates
625 S 6th St.
Las Vegas, NV 89101
(702) 385-9777